California Power Grab Portends Profits

Publisher’s Note:  California is making a literal power grab. It has to do with home solar panels and how much residents can get paid for the excess power they generate. It’s a big deal given the push for greener infrastructure.

With the advent of virtual power plants, the state is trying to rewrite laws to bilk citizens out of money they should be getting for their solar production.

I explain it all in an excerpt from this week's Bizarro World, below. And keep an eye out for more on this topic, as I'll have a new video out in the next few days about why virtual power plants are going to revolutionize the grid and drive investor profits similar to the way Amazon disrupted all of global retail.

Enjoy,

Nick Hodge
Editor, Daily Profit Cycle


(Click to Play)

 
 
 
Gerardo Del Real
Gerardo Del Real:  Can you enlighten us about California's new solar law?
nick hodge
Nick Hodge: Yeah. This California solar thing kind of pissed me off while I was reading it. Back in the day — 2007, 2008 — it was all about incentivizing solar. You had to put solar on your roofs because it's more efficient, it's green, it reduces your bill. It helps out the grid. All the reasons.

Now, here we are in 2021 and solar has had mass adoption of solar, well over 5% of utility clients have it installed. And some of those households sell their excess power back to the grid.

It's called net metering when you get a fee or a price for selling the electricity that your solar panels produce back into the grid. And now it's reached such a critical mass that the people that have solar are seeing significantly lower rates and people that don't have solar are having inflated rates because...

Gerardo Del Real
Gerardo Del Real: Inflation is real.
nick hodge

Nick Hodge: Right. Well, there you go. But it’s because the solar that you sell into the grid is at a fixed price of 25 cents a kilowatt hour, that's the net metering law.  What it sounds like California lawmakers are trying to do is say, "Hey, if you've got solar, we're going to change this law. We're going to kind of pull the rug out from under your feet."

And especially if you're wealthy, they're basically saying that solar is exacerbating wealth inequality, and that's just a little too much jumping the shark for me. Because basically the state is saying, "We offered you this program to put solar on your roof, and now we want to take it away." But they want to keep it going for lower income brackets, who would get the same $0.25 cents, but wealthier people would get the market rate, which is just $0.03.

But really they want all that already-installed electricity at $0.03 because they need it to stabilize the grid. You’ll remember the California blackouts recently because of wildfires and winds.

So it sounds like California is making a literal power grab. And so it caught my eye. But for me it just seems glaringly obvious that a free market solution is the best solution. Why not let the market bear what the market will bear for the price of solar electricity, and everybody gets paid the same?

And then if you want to incent a lower income brackets, give them a tax break or a credit or something to subsidize their cost of installation.

Why not just let the market bear the true price discovery, right?

Soon, I think you’ll see that via what's called a virtual power plant. When you can just sell into the market at the then market rate, which by the way the article I was reading about California didn't mention. This is something the FERC is trying to do.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has an order — Order no. 841 — that essentially does that. It says anybody can be a utility. You don't have to meet a threshold to be a utility, like is currently in place. Anybody that wants to sell power into the grid can be a utility and do so at the market rate.

And so hopefully California gets superseded here in some way, and we can just create a true free market system for power transactions, electricity sales. And I would bet that blockchain has something to do with that as well. Like storing the transactions because we have the capacity and the technology to do that now.

Gerardo Del Real
Gerardo Del Real: Government being government, right?
nick hodge
Nick Hodge: Oh, well sure, they're here to help — always.

 

 

Nick Hodge is the co-owner and publisher of Daily Profit Cycle and Resource Stock Digest. He's also the founder of Hodge Family Office, the umbrella organization for his three premium services: Hodge Family OfficeFamily Office Advantage, and Foundational Profits. He specializes in private placements and speculations in early stage ventures, and has raised tens of millions of dollars of investment capital for resource, energy, cannabis, and medical technology companies. Co-author of two best-selling investment books, including Energy Investing for Dummies, his insights have been shared on news programs and in magazines and newspapers around the world.

*Follow Nick on Twitter.